Erstmal ne Frage, da ich mit der Java-RT nicht so fit bin:
Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, die Auflösung des JAVA-Fensters zu vergrössern, sodaß ToT größer angezeigt wird?
Auf meinem Bildschirm habe ich unter Windows 1280x1024 eingestellt und da ist das Java-Fenster geradezu winzig. Die Vollbildfunktion vergrössert zwar das Fenster, aber nicht den Tamar-Screen.
Gruß, James.
Sorry Dorgie - I forgot! Here's it in English:
Prior to any testing a question because my JAVA knowledge is not so deep:
Is there a possibility to change the resolution of the JAVA screen to get a larger ToT display?
With my Windows screen resolution of 1280x1024 ToT in the JAVA-windows is quite tiny. Using the full-screen mode of the JAVA-window has no effect on ToT.screen.
Greetings, James.
Auflösung/resolution
Moderatoren: Dorgie, Moderatoren Team
-
Freakinus
- r_guardian
- Beiträge: 539
- Registriert: Di Sep 09, 2003 1:00 am
- Wohnort: Helibrunna, Island of Exevor
- Kontaktdaten:
Auflösung/resolution
Zuletzt geändert von Freakinus am Sa Aug 27, 2005 5:48 pm, insgesamt 1-mal geändert.
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply...
There are two options ... either you run it in windowed mode at a resolution of 640x480 or you run it in fullscreen mode, also at a resolution of 640x480.
There's nothing much I can do do change this since all the art of Tamar is in that resolution.
A bigger window would just mean a lot of <insert preferred color> wasted space around the screens.
Although it would possible to use a scaler to scale the original art to a new resolution (cfr exult for example).
Dorgie.
Sorry for the late reply...
There are two options ... either you run it in windowed mode at a resolution of 640x480 or you run it in fullscreen mode, also at a resolution of 640x480.
There's nothing much I can do do change this since all the art of Tamar is in that resolution.
A bigger window would just mean a lot of <insert preferred color> wasted space around the screens.
Although it would possible to use a scaler to scale the original art to a new resolution (cfr exult for example).
Dorgie.
-
Freakinus
- r_guardian
- Beiträge: 539
- Registriert: Di Sep 09, 2003 1:00 am
- Wohnort: Helibrunna, Island of Exevor
- Kontaktdaten:
Hy Dorgie.
I guess changing the resolution of Windows ist nothing anyone would think about. Maybe I also misunderstood this part, but anyway:
You mentioned the scaling. This is what I thought about. I don't know how other programms (also like ToT Windows version) do this, but they change the resolution somehow when starting the program. So if you find out how Java can do this (or even more IF Java can do this...), that would be very useful.
Kind regards, JAmes.
I guess changing the resolution of Windows ist nothing anyone would think about. Maybe I also misunderstood this part, but anyway:
You mentioned the scaling. This is what I thought about. I don't know how other programms (also like ToT Windows version) do this, but they change the resolution somehow when starting the program. So if you find out how Java can do this (or even more IF Java can do this...), that would be very useful.
Kind regards, JAmes.
Hi,
I actually meant running the java client fullscreen, which sets the desktop resolution at 640x480 as long as it runs.
v0.10 always runs in windowed mode (mainly because I forgot to put a switch in for fullscreen mode).
I'll make sure that 0.11 wil run in fullscreen mode too
I'll mess around with scaling which actually means taking the screen image at it's native resolution (640 x 480) and scale it to whatever resolution you desire (1024x768) for example, it will look bad but now i'm interested to see how bad :p
Dorgie
I actually meant running the java client fullscreen, which sets the desktop resolution at 640x480 as long as it runs.
v0.10 always runs in windowed mode (mainly because I forgot to put a switch in for fullscreen mode).
I'll make sure that 0.11 wil run in fullscreen mode too
I'll mess around with scaling which actually means taking the screen image at it's native resolution (640 x 480) and scale it to whatever resolution you desire (1024x768) for example, it will look bad but now i'm interested to see how bad :p
Dorgie
